Quantifying livestock vulnerability to snow disasters in the Tibetan Plateau: Comparing different modeling techniques for prediction | |
Ye, Tao1,2,3,6; Liu, Weihang1,2,3; Mu, Qingyang1,2,3; Zong, Shuo1; Li, Yijia1,7; Shi, Peijun1,2,3,4,5 | |
刊名 | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION |
2020-09-01 | |
卷号 | 48页码:10 |
关键词 | Livestock snow disaster Vulnerability Generalized additive models Random forest Boosted regression trees |
ISSN号 | 2212-4209 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101578 |
通讯作者 | Ye, Tao(yetao@bnu.edu.cn) |
英文摘要 | Quantitative vulnerability relationships describing the susceptibility of socioeconomic losses in response to climate change are critical for natural disaster loss modeling and risk assessment. Modeling such vulnerability requires methods capable of handling complicated multi-factor, non-linear, and interactive relationships. Here, we compared the performance of generalized additive models (GAM) and random forest (RF) and boosted regression trees (BRT) in quantifying livestock vulnerability to snow disasters in the Tibetan Plateau for both explanatory and predictive purposes. Our results indicated promising explanatory power of these three modeling methods, with deviance-based R-2 up to 0.720. They consistently revealed geophysical and socioeconomic factors that contributed to higher mortality rates. Nevertheless, GAM model failed to identify the critical influence of snow depth, mainly due to its smoothing scheme when fitting models to data. They also differed in the selection of the most important socioeconomic variable to represent prevention capacity. From a predictive perspective, all three modeling methods also showed promising predictive power, yet RF had the smallest prediction error, with less number of predictors used. Therefore, the predictive version of RF may well be the best choice for use in future risk analyses, yet those of BRT and GAM can serve as an alternative if needed. |
资助项目 | National Key Research and Development Program of China[2016YFA0602404] ; Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP)[2019QZKK0606] ; Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China[41621061] |
WOS关键词 | REGRESSION TREE ; RANDOM FOREST ; CLIMATE-CHANGE ; RISK ; CLASSIFICATION ; IMPACTS ; MANAGEMENT ; RESPONSES |
WOS研究方向 | Geology ; Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences ; Water Resources |
语种 | 英语 |
出版者 | ELSEVIER |
WOS记录号 | WOS:000556556400014 |
资助机构 | National Key Research and Development Program of China ; Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (STEP) ; Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China |
内容类型 | 期刊论文 |
源URL | [http://ir.igsnrr.ac.cn/handle/311030/158132] |
专题 | 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 |
通讯作者 | Ye, Tao |
作者单位 | 1.Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Key Lab Environm Change & Nat Disaster,Minist Edu, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China 2.Minist Emergency Management, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China 3.Minist Educ, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China 4.Peoples Govt Qinghai Prov, Acad Plateau Sci & Sustainabil, Xining 810016, Peoples R China 5.Beijing Normal Univ, Xining 810016, Peoples R China 6.Boston Univ, Frederick S Pardee Ctr Study Longer Range Future, Boston, MA 02215 USA 7.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Ye, Tao,Liu, Weihang,Mu, Qingyang,et al. Quantifying livestock vulnerability to snow disasters in the Tibetan Plateau: Comparing different modeling techniques for prediction[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION,2020,48:10. |
APA | Ye, Tao,Liu, Weihang,Mu, Qingyang,Zong, Shuo,Li, Yijia,&Shi, Peijun.(2020).Quantifying livestock vulnerability to snow disasters in the Tibetan Plateau: Comparing different modeling techniques for prediction.INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION,48,10. |
MLA | Ye, Tao,et al."Quantifying livestock vulnerability to snow disasters in the Tibetan Plateau: Comparing different modeling techniques for prediction".INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION 48(2020):10. |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论