Criteria for confounders in epidemiological studies | |
Geng, Z ; Guo, JH ; Fung, WK | |
2002 | |
关键词 | causal effect comparability confounding counterfactual model epidemiological methods CONTINGENCY-TABLES CAUSAL INFERENCE COLLAPSIBILITY RISK RATIO |
英文摘要 | The paper addresses a formal definition of a confounder based on the qualitative definition that is commonly used in standard epidemiology text-books. To derive the criterion for a factor to be a confounder given by Miettinen and Cook and to clarify inconsistency between various criteria for a confounder, we introduce the concepts of an irrelevant factor, an occasional confounder and a uniformly irrelevant factor. We discuss criteria for checking these and show that Miettinen and Cook's criterion can also be applied to occasional confounders. Moreover, we consider situations with multiple potential confounders, and we obtain two necessary conditions that are satisfied by each confounder set. None of the definitions and results presented in this paper require the ignorability and sufficient control confounding assumptions which are commonly employed in observational and epidemiological studies.; Statistics & Probability; SCI(E); 13; ARTICLE; 3-15; 64 |
语种 | 英语 |
出处 | SCI |
出版者 | journal of the royal statistical society series b statistical methodology |
内容类型 | 其他 |
源URL | [http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/210081] ![]() |
专题 | 数学科学学院 |
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714 | Geng, Z,Guo, JH,Fung, WK. Criteria for confounders in epidemiological studies. 2002-01-01. |
个性服务 |
查看访问统计 |
相关权益政策 |
暂无数据 |
收藏/分享 |
除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。
修改评论