High-throughput terrestrial biodiversity assessments: mitochondrial metabarcoding, metagenomics or metatranscriptomics?
Guo-Jie Brandon-Mong1,5; Han-Ming Gan6,7,8; Kong-Wah Sing9; John-James Wilson2,3,4
刊名Mitochondrial DNA A
2018
期号*页码:1-8
关键词Arthropods Dna Barcodes Genome Skimming Mitogenomics Transcriptomics
DOI10.1080/24701394.2018.1455189
英文摘要

Consensus on the optimal high-throughput sequencing (HTS) approach to examine biodiversity inmixed terrestrial arthropod samples has not been reached. Metatranscriptomics could increase the pro-portion of taxonomically informative mitochondrial reads in HTS outputs but has not been investigatedfor terrestrial arthropod samples. We compared the efficiency of 16S rRNA metabarcoding, metagenom-ics and metatranscriptomics for detecting species in a mixed terrestrial arthropod sample (pooled DNA/RNA from 38 taxa). 16S rRNA metabarcoding and nuclear rRNA-depleted metatranscriptomics had thehighest detection rate with 97% of input species detected. Based on cytochrome c oxidase I, metage-nomics had the highest detection rate with 82% of input species detected, but metatranscriptomicsproduced a larger proportion of reads matching (Sanger) reference sequences. Metatranscriptomicswith nuclear rRNA depletion may offer advantages over metabarcoding through reducing the numberof spurious operational taxonomic units while retaining high detection rates, and offers natural enrich-ment of mitochondrial sequences which may enable increased species detection rates compared withmetagenomics.

语种英语
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://159.226.149.26:8080/handle/152453/12352]  
专题昆明动物研究所_生命条形码中心
通讯作者Kong-Wah Sing; John-James Wilson
作者单位1.Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
2.School of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Science, University of South Wales, Pontypridd, UK
3.Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Medical Science, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
4.International College Beijing, China Agricultural University, Beijing, PR China
5.Faculty of Science, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
6.School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Centre for Integrative Ecology, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
7.Genomics Facility, Tropical and Medicine Biology Platform, Monash University Malaysia, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
8.School of Science, Monash University Malaysia, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia
9.South China DNA Barcoding Center, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, PR China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Guo-Jie Brandon-Mong,Han-Ming Gan,Kong-Wah Sing,et al. High-throughput terrestrial biodiversity assessments: mitochondrial metabarcoding, metagenomics or metatranscriptomics?[J]. Mitochondrial DNA A,2018(*):1-8.
APA Guo-Jie Brandon-Mong,Han-Ming Gan,Kong-Wah Sing,&John-James Wilson.(2018).High-throughput terrestrial biodiversity assessments: mitochondrial metabarcoding, metagenomics or metatranscriptomics?.Mitochondrial DNA A(*),1-8.
MLA Guo-Jie Brandon-Mong,et al."High-throughput terrestrial biodiversity assessments: mitochondrial metabarcoding, metagenomics or metatranscriptomics?".Mitochondrial DNA A .*(2018):1-8.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace