QQ客服 官方微博 反馈留言

	Whether lidocaine or dry needling should be the favored treatment after meta analysis
	Liu Lin[1]; Huang Qiang-Min[2]; Wang Long-Bing[3]
刊名	Journal of bodywork and movement therapies
	2014
卷号	18页码:517-8
关键词	Dry needling Lidocaine Meta-analysis Myofascial trigger points
ISSN号	1532-9283
URL标识	查看原文
内容类型	期刊论文
URI标识	http://www.corc.org.cn/handle/1471x/2280246
专题	上海大学
作者单位	1.[1]Institution of Human Science, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China. Electronic address: liulinst1989@foxmail.com. 2.[2]Institution of Human Science, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China 3.Department of Pain Rehabilitation, Shanghai Hudong Hospital, Shanghai 200438, China. Electronic address: huaqia404@aliyun.com. 4.[3]Institution of Human Science, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai 200438, China. Electronic address: wlb1014389920@163.com.
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	Liu Lin[1],Huang Qiang-Min[2],Wang Long-Bing[3]. Whether lidocaine or dry needling should be the favored treatment after meta analysis[J]. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies,2014,18:517-8.
APA	Liu Lin[1],Huang Qiang-Min[2],&Wang Long-Bing[3].(2014).Whether lidocaine or dry needling should be the favored treatment after meta analysis.Journal of bodywork and movement therapies,18,517-8.
MLA	Liu Lin[1],et al."Whether lidocaine or dry needling should be the favored treatment after meta analysis".Journal of bodywork and movement therapies 18(2014):517-8.

个性服务

查看访问统计

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。