Comparison of runoff and soil loss in different tillage systems in the Mollisol region of Northeast China
Lu, Jia3,4; Bian, Feng3,4; Zheng, FL (reprint author), Inst Soil & Water Conservat, 26 Xinong Rd, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.; Xu, Ximeng3,4; Zheng, Fenli3,4; Wilson, G. V2; He, Chao3,4
刊名SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH
2018
卷号177页码:1-11
关键词Contour Ridge System Ridge Failure Overland Flow Concentration Conservation Tillage Rainfall Simulation
ISSN号0167-1987
DOI10.1016/j.still.2017.10.005
文献子类Article
英文摘要Longitudinal ridge tillage is the conventional tillage method in the cold, Mollisol region of Northeast China in which furrows are oriented up and down the slope. In part due to the use of this tillage system with large slope lengths, soil erosion is a serious problem in this region. Currently, it is unclear what the best tillage system and ridge orientation is for sustainable agriculture in this region. Thus to compare the runoff and soil loss in longitudinal (LRS) and contour ridge (CRS) systems to a flat tillage system (FTS), a series of simulated rainfall experiments were conducted. A large soil pan (8 m-long, 1.5 m-wide, and 0.6 m-deep) and a side sprinkler rainfall simulation system were used in this study with the three tillage systems (LRS, CRS, FTS) under three rainfall intensities (50, 75 and 100 mm h(-1)) at a 5 slope gradient. The results showed that runoff and soil loss in the LRS were larger than those in the CRS and FTS due to a shift in erosion pattern from sheet to concentrated flow erosion along furrows which led to shear stress increases. Contour ridge failures occurred in the 75 and 100 mm h-1 treatments by breaching of ridges when water stored in furrows exceeded their storage capacity. Breaching changed the runoff and soil loss by providing a large sediment source to the convergent flow. Water storage of CRS furrows was constant as rainfall intensity varied which led to overtopping during large storm conditions. Shifting conventional LRS to CRS with modifications to retain more rainwater during low to moderate rainfall events is highly recommended as this would reduce soil loss and enhance infiltration. The FTS exhibited the lowest runoff and soil loss which is recommended for the Mollisol region of Northeast China in large storm conditions.
学科主题Soil Science
出版地PO BOX 211, 1000 AE AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
语种英语
出版者ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
WOS记录号WOS:000424073900001
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://ir.iswc.ac.cn/handle/361005/7831]  
专题水保所科研产出--SCI_2018--SCI
通讯作者Zheng, FL (reprint author), Inst Soil & Water Conservat, 26 Xinong Rd, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China.
作者单位1.MWR, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
2.USDA ARS, Natl Sedimentat Lab, Oxford, MS 38655 USA
3.Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, State Key Lab Soil Eros & Dryland Farming Loess P, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
4.Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Lu, Jia,Bian, Feng,Zheng, FL ,et al. Comparison of runoff and soil loss in different tillage systems in the Mollisol region of Northeast China[J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH,2018,177:1-11.
APA Lu, Jia.,Bian, Feng.,Zheng, FL .,Xu, Ximeng.,Zheng, Fenli.,...&He, Chao.(2018).Comparison of runoff and soil loss in different tillage systems in the Mollisol region of Northeast China.SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH,177,1-11.
MLA Lu, Jia,et al."Comparison of runoff and soil loss in different tillage systems in the Mollisol region of Northeast China".SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH 177(2018):1-11.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace