Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review
Watson, J G.(Watson, John G.)[1,2,3]; Chen,L.W.A(Chen,L.W.Antony)[1,4]; Lowenthal,DH(Lowenthal, Douglas H.)[1,3]; Chow,J.C(Chow,Judith C.)[1,2,3]; Wang,XL(Wang,Xiaoliang)[1,3]
刊名Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health
2015-05-07
卷号8期号:3页码:243-263
关键词Pm2.5 Mass Closure Chemical Speciation Organic Matter Sampling Artifact
DOI10.1007/s11869-015-0338-3
文献子类期刊论文
英文摘要

Major components of suspended particulate matter (PM) are inorganic ions, organic matter (OM), elemental carbon (EC), geological minerals, salt, non-mineral elements, and water. Since oxygen (O) and hydrogen (H) are not directly measured in chemical speciation networks, more than ten weighting equations have been applied to account for their presence, thereby approximating gravimetric mass. Assumptions for these weights are not the same under all circumstances. OM is estimated from an organic carbon (OC) multiplier (f) that ranges from 1.4 to 1.8 in most studies, but f can be larger for highly polar compounds from biomass burning and secondary organic aerosols. The mineral content of fugitive dust is estimated from elemental markers, while the water-soluble content is accounted for as inorganic ions or salt. Part of the discrepancy between measured and reconstructed PM mass is due to the measurement process, including: (1) organic vapors adsorbed on quartz-fiber filters; (2) evaporation of volatile ammonium nitrate and OM between the weighed Teflon-membrane filter and the nylon-membrane and/or quartz-fiber filters on which ions and carbon are measured; and (3) liquid water retained on soluble constituents during filter weighing. The widely used IMPROVE equations were developed to characterize particle light extinction in U.S. national parks, and variants of this approach have been tested in a large variety of environments. Important factors for improving agreement between measured and reconstructed PM mass are the f multiplier for converting OC to OM and accounting for OC sampling artifacts.

语种英语
内容类型期刊论文
源URL[http://ir.ieecas.cn/handle/361006/9489]  
专题地球环境研究所_黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室(2010~)
作者单位1.Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute,Reno, NV 89512, USA;
2.The State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology,Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences,Xi’an, Shaanxi 710075, China;
3.Graduate Faculty, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89503, USA;
4.Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Universityof Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Watson, J G.,Chen,L.W.A,Lowenthal,DH,et al. Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review[J]. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health,2015,8(3):243-263.
APA Watson, J G.,Chen,L.W.A,Lowenthal,DH,Chow,J.C,&Wang,XL.(2015).Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review.Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health,8(3),243-263.
MLA Watson, J G.,et al."Mass reconstruction methods for PM2.5: a review".Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health 8.3(2015):243-263.
个性服务
查看访问统计
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。


©版权所有 ©2017 CSpace - Powered by CSpace