QQ客服 官方微博 反馈留言

	纯电动车加速—滑行(PnG)驾驶策略的节能潜力
	张抗抗 ; 欧阳明高 ; 徐梁飞 ; 华剑锋 ; 李建秋 ; 赵小羽 ; 成艾国 ; ZHANG Kangkang ; OUYANG Minggao ; XU Liangfei ; HUA Jianfeng ; LI Jianqiu ; ZHAO Xiaoyu ; CHENG Aiguo
	2016-03-30 ; 2016-03-30
关键词	纯电动汽车 驾驶策略 加速-滑行(PnG) 定速驾驶 功率损耗 能量流 battery electric vehicle driving strategy pulse and gliding(PnG) constant speed cruise power loss energy flow U469.72
其他题名	Energy-saving potential of a pulse and gliding(PnG) driving strategy for battery electric vehicles
中文摘要	通过仿真与测功机台架试验,评估了一种纯电动车加速-滑行(PnG)驾驶策略的节能潜力。研究PnG策略中多个参数之间的关系,包括震荡距离、PnG周期与单位行驶里程平均电耗。建立电机与传动系统的空转损耗模型。用试验进行模型参数辨识。对滑行阶段的离合器断开或闭合的PnG驾驶策略和定速策略等3种情景,进行能量流仿真分析与转鼓试验。结果显示:在相同平均速度的条件下,无离合器的纯电动车PnG驾驶策略,没有节能潜力;与定速策略相比,滑行阶段离合器断开的策略,可节能约8.5%。; The energy-saving potential was estimated by simulations and drum tests for Pulse and Gliding(PnG) driving strategies of battery electric vehicles. The relationships were investigated between several PnG strategy parameters including oscillation distance, PnG cycle time, and average power consumption per unit driving distance. Idling loss models were established for the motor and the powertrain. The parameters were identified by drum tests. Three driving strategies, including the constant-speed driving strategy, the PnG strategy with clutch, and the PnG strategy without clutch, were simulated by energy flow analysis, and then experimented by drum test. The results show that the PnG strategy without clutch has no energy-saving potentials while the PnG strategy with clutch can save 8.5% energy at the same average speed, compared with the constant-speed cruise strategy at the same velocity.
语种	中文 ; 中文
内容类型	期刊论文
源URL	[http://ir.lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/ir/item.do?handle=123456789/144777]
专题	清华大学
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	张抗抗,欧阳明高,徐梁飞,等. 纯电动车加速—滑行(PnG)驾驶策略的节能潜力[J],2016, 2016.
APA	张抗抗.,欧阳明高.,徐梁飞.,华剑锋.,李建秋.,...&CHENG Aiguo.(2016).纯电动车加速—滑行(PnG)驾驶策略的节能潜力..
MLA	张抗抗,et al."纯电动车加速—滑行(PnG)驾驶策略的节能潜力".(2016).

个性服务

查看访问统计

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。