QQ客服 官方微博 反馈留言

	CFX中湍流模型用于分析超临界水传热的适用性评价
	李捷 ; 江光明 ; 俞冀阳 ; 于俊崇 ; LI Jie ; JIANG Guang-ming ; YU Ji-yang ; YU Jun-chong
	2016-03-30 ; 2016-03-30
关键词	CFX 超临界水 传热 湍流模型 浮力 CFX supercritical water heat transfer turbulence model buoyancy TL33
其他题名	Performance Assessment of Turbulence Models in CFX for Predicting Heat Transfer of Supercritical Water
中文摘要	通过两组典型实验数据,对商业软件CFX的12种湍流模型用于模拟超临界水竖直向上流动传热的性能进行评价。研究结果表明:强迫对流时,BSL代数应力模型与实验结果符合最好,但各模型间差异均不大;混合对流时,基于壁面函数的ε类型湍流模型不能模拟传热恶化趋势,自动壁面处理的ω类型湍流模型能模拟出传热恶化的趋势,但各模型预测结果和实验结果相差较大。评价结果表明近壁面的处理方式对模拟结果影响很大。此外,基于湍流普朗特数模拟湍流热流密度及未考虑密度脉动对传热的影响均是导致不能正确模拟超临界水传热行为的因素,建议对湍流模型进行改进。; Based on two sets of experimental data,the performance of predicting heat transfer of supercritical water in a vertical tube using CFX code with 12turbulence models was assessed.The result of BSL explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model agrees the most closely with the experimental data under forced convection,but the differences among various turbulence models are small. However,under mixed convection condition,εtype turbulence models with wall function can not predict heat transfer deterioration phenomenon,while ω type turbulence models with automatic wall treatment can,but the predicted wall temperatures deviate largely from experimental results.The assessment results show that near wall treatment methods have great influence on the simulation results.The following two factors also lead to the unreasonably predicted heat transfer behavior:Modeling turbulent heat flux with turbulent Prandtl number and neglecting density fluctuation.It is recommended that turbulence models should be improved.
语种	中文 ; 中文
内容类型	期刊论文
源URL	[http://ir.lib.tsinghua.edu.cn/ir/item.do?handle=123456789/143109]
专题	清华大学
推荐引用方式 GB/T 7714	李捷,江光明,俞冀阳,等. CFX中湍流模型用于分析超临界水传热的适用性评价[J],2016, 2016.
APA	李捷.,江光明.,俞冀阳.,于俊崇.,LI Jie.,...&YU Jun-chong.(2016).CFX中湍流模型用于分析超临界水传热的适用性评价..
MLA	李捷,et al."CFX中湍流模型用于分析超临界水传热的适用性评价".(2016).

个性服务

查看访问统计

相关权益政策

暂无数据

收藏/分享

除非特别说明，本系统中所有内容都受版权保护，并保留所有权利。